Comment 17 for bug 1928360

@Seth: I suppose that the DENIED file I attached in comment #7 does not help much.

Fcitx 5 is a separate process, i.e. /usr/bin/fcitx5 as opposed to /usr/bin/fcitx. When in Chromium it behaves as if fcitx5 does not exist, even if the process runs and I can use fcitx5 in other applications. I can't even switch to a fcitx5 input method engine when in Chromium, let alone use such an input engine for typing. Maybe that explains why nothing fcitx5 related is reflected as DENIED lines.

I'm thinking that maybe there is a need to create the fcitx5 and fcitx5-strict abstractions using the already existing fcitx and fcitx-strict abstractions as models.