I agree that using 69-language-selectors-*.conf is more flexible IF ubuntu resulted to use Regional Subset OTF instead of Super OTC.
We should not fallback a sans-serif font to serif.
Also, they provide fixed width font for regular and bold weight font start from 1.002, as known as Source Han Sans HW or Noto Sans Mono CJK.
As their monospace fonts(english letters) are designed for SHS/Noto, i don't see the point to fallback DejaVu Sans Mono.
I agree that using 69-language- selectors- *.conf is more flexible IF ubuntu resulted to use Regional Subset OTF instead of Super OTC.
We should not fallback a sans-serif font to serif.
Also, they provide fixed width font for regular and bold weight font start from 1.002, as known as Source Han Sans HW or Noto Sans Mono CJK.
As their monospace fonts(english letters) are designed for SHS/Noto, i don't see the point to fallback DejaVu Sans Mono.