On 2013-06-14 17:37, Iain Lane wrote:
> 30-cjk-aliases looks like it's still useful, althoug /maybe/
> something which can live in fontconfig itself upstream?
Well, I for one am not able to argue for its inclusion in fontconfig. One possibility is to enable it for now by simply adding a related symlink to debian/language-selector-common.links. Then we have some time to get feedback from cjk users before the release of next LTS 14.04.
> I'm not sure about 99-... — if nobody misses it then maybe it is
> time for it to go away. If kept then it needs to be fixed like all of
> the others (that's this bug).
Yeah, I started to fix it as a preparation for fixing this bug.
Then I noticed that there is no symlink. :( We could of course add a symlink also for this file (for all users), and see what feedback the cjk users provide.
Thanks for your comments, Laney!
On 2013-06-14 17:37, Iain Lane wrote:
> 30-cjk-aliases looks like it's still useful, althoug /maybe/
> something which can live in fontconfig itself upstream?
Well, I for one am not able to argue for its inclusion in fontconfig. One possibility is to enable it for now by simply adding a related symlink to debian/ language- selector- common. links. Then we have some time to get feedback from cjk users before the release of next LTS 14.04.
> I'm not sure about 99-... — if nobody misses it then maybe it is
> time for it to go away. If kept then it needs to be fixed like all of
> the others (that's this bug).
Yeah, I started to fix it as a preparation for fixing this bug.
https:/ /launchpad. net/~gunnarhj/ +archive/ misc/+sourcepub /3261343/ +listing- archive- extra
Then I noticed that there is no symlink. :( We could of course add a symlink also for this file (for all users), and see what feedback the cjk users provide.