I think this bug is coming from python/print function.
As in Arabic,we have 6 plural forms. we used NOT to include the variable (%i for example) in 0th, 1st & 2nd forms. This is the correct language.
I have check both c/printf and python/print. c/printf is more robust.
c/printf accepts this:
n=1; printf("One hour.", n);
in other hand python/print rises an error:
n=1 print "One hour." % n
As a work around we could do some thing like "(%i) One hour.".
But should we pass this bug to python?
I think this bug is coming from python/print function.
As in Arabic,we have 6 plural forms. we used NOT to include the variable (%i for example) in 0th, 1st & 2nd forms. This is the correct language.
I have check both c/printf and python/print. c/printf is more robust.
c/printf accepts this:
n=1;
printf("One hour.", n);
in other hand python/print rises an error:
n=1
print "One hour." % n
As a work around we could do some thing like "(%i) One hour.".
But should we pass this bug to python?