In message <email address hidden> Bug 236028 <email address hidden> writes: > In locale nan_TW@Latn, would > > mon="1goeÌ�h;2goeÌ�h;3goeÌ�h;4goeÌ�h;5goeÌ�h;6goeÌ�h;7goeÌ�h;8goeÌ�h;9goeÌ�h;10goeÌ�h;11goeÌ�h;12goeÌ�h" > > be more appropriate than > > mon="chiaâ�¿-goeÌ�h;jÄ«-goeÌ�h;saâ�¿-goeÌ�h;sì-goeÌ�h;gÅ�Í-goeÌ�h;laÌ�k-goeÌ�h;chhit- > goeÌ�h;peh-goeÌ�h;káu-goeÌ�h;chaÌ�p-goeÌ�h;chaÌ�p-it-goeÌ�h;chaÌ�p-jÄ«-goeÌ�h" > > ? > > This problem needs Kaihsu's confirm. (And Arne's technical review?)
Sure.
In message <email address hidden> Bug 236028 #65533; h;2goeÌ& #65533; h;3goeÌ& #65533; h;4goeÌ& #65533; h;5goeÌ& #65533; h;6goeÌ& #65533; h;7goeÌ& #65533; h;8goeÌ& #65533; h;9goeÌ& #65533; h;10goeÌ& #65533; h;11goeÌ& #65533; h;12goeÌ& #65533; h" #65533; ¿-goeÌ& #65533; h;jÄ«-goeÌ& #65533; h;saâ&# 65533;¿ -goeÌ&# 65533;h; sì-goeÌ& #65533; h;gÅ� Í-goeÌ& #65533; h;laÌ&# 65533;k- goeÌ� h;chhit- h;peh-goeÌ& #65533; h;káu- goeÌ� h;chaÌ& #65533; p-goeÌ& #65533; h;chaÌ& #65533; p-it-goeÌ& #65533; h;chaÌ& #65533; p-jÄ«-goeÌ& #65533; h"
<email address hidden> writes:
> In locale nan_TW@Latn, would
>
>
mon="1goeÌ&
>
> be more appropriate than
>
>
mon="chiaâ&
> goe�
>
> ?
>
> This problem needs Kaihsu's confirm. (And Arne's technical review?)
Sure.