On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:19:43PM -0000, takeda64 wrote:
> Seriously, this is a bug, maybe it's not a bug in the sense the software
> is broken, but it is poorly designed.
Yes, it is a bug. It's filed in our bug tracker, and what's more, it's
fixed (see bug 251242, of which this is a duplicate)!
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:19:43PM -0000, takeda64 wrote:
> Seriously, this is a bug, maybe it's not a bug in the sense the software
> is broken, but it is poorly designed.
Yes, it is a bug. It's filed in our bug tracker, and what's more, it's
fixed (see bug 251242, of which this is a duplicate)!
You're welcome. :-)
--
- mdz