Aniversaries are duplicate in korganizer when both partners exist in the addressbook.

[Luis Silva]

Binary package hint: korganizer

This is very simple to reproduce:

Create contact A in kaddressbook.
Create contact B in kaddressbook.
Mark contact B as a partner of contact A and set an aniversary date in A's details.
Mark contact A as a partner of contact B and set an aniversary date in B's details.

What you get is two entries in korganizer:
A & B's anniversary
B & A's anniversary

The expected behavior is to find only one of these, not both. I would also expet that kaddressbook filled in the information for B automatically after it is set for A.

This seems to be valid for the whole kde4.x series of pim apps.

[Jonathan Kolberg (bulldog98)]

Thanks for your bug report.

I can confirm that with KDEPim 4.7. I’ll forward that to bugs.kde.org

[Jonathan Kolberg (bulldog98)]

Version: 4.7 (using KDE 4.7.0)
OS: Linux

This is a forwarded bug reported by Luis Silva. The original url is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdepim/+bug/420680

Reproducible: Didn't try

Steps to Reproduce:
Create contact A in kaddressbook.
Create contact B in kaddressbook.
Mark contact B as a partner of contact A and set an aniversary date in A's details.
Mark contact A as a partner of contact B and set an aniversary date in B's details.

Actual Results:
What you get is two entries in korganizer:
A & B's anniversary
B & A's anniversary

Expected Results:
Only one entry should show up

[Jonathan Kolberg (bulldog98)]

This is still the case with latest git build

[Justin Zobel (justin-zobel)]

Thank you for reporting this bug in KDE software. As it has been a while since this issue was reported, can we please ask you to see if you can reproduce the issue with a recent software version?

If you can reproduce the issue, please change the status to "REPORTED" when replying. Thank you!

[Jonathan Kolberg (bulldog98)]

As far as I can see the feature to mark a person as a partner of another in your contacts is gone. If you just type in the name in the input field for partner it still happens. So I'm not sure if we should still count that as a bug, or if the feature of marking as partner was discontinued.