Comment 151 for bug 504201

Revision history for this message
In , Pino Toscano (pinotree) wrote :

(In reply to comment #111)
> As for binary compatibility, do we need binary compatibility also for the
> protected functions in FilePrinter or only for the public ones?

For the public ones for sure.
About the protected methods: they should have not added that way at all,
originally, this is something that slipped in.
Most probably you can just add the new functions as static inside the .cpp
(inside an anonymous namespace to be safe, even).