Comment 2 for bug 62291

Revision history for this message
Anthony Mercatante (tonio) wrote :

I'm rejecting this for 3 reasons :
- caches are *evil* and are to be avoided as much as possible, since it is a pain for the user to figure out what happens when it gets corrupted (look at the DNS cache on Windows XP for a good example).
- that normal behavior, and implementing this would mean lots of work or a very, very low usage.
- why not the same over smb shares, ftp, nfs or any remove location accessible via vfs or ioslmave ? If we start even thinking of implement this, we would never see the end...