Op zaterdag 17-03-2007 om 15:22 uur [tijdzone +0000], schreef rbmorse:
> On Saturday 17 March 2007 06:45:19 Sarah Hobbs wrote:
> > it's in feisty because if we remove it, we then have to do all the
> > packaging again when it *does* work.
> >
> > However, i'm considering filing a removal request, just because it
> > doesnt build, not even with 2.0.7.
>
> I thought KDAR was depreciated and not being developed anymore. Is this not
> correct?
If this is the case, could you please suggest a program with similar
functionality? Tnx.
Op zaterdag 17-03-2007 om 15:22 uur [tijdzone +0000], schreef rbmorse:
> On Saturday 17 March 2007 06:45:19 Sarah Hobbs wrote:
> > it's in feisty because if we remove it, we then have to do all the
> > packaging again when it *does* work.
> >
> > However, i'm considering filing a removal request, just because it
> > doesnt build, not even with 2.0.7.
>
> I thought KDAR was depreciated and not being developed anymore. Is this not
> correct?
If this is the case, could you please suggest a program with similar
functionality? Tnx.
--
Amedee Van Gasse <email address hidden>