Also, following a brief IRC conversation, I decided to make the package Arch: any. I understand that this is the convention since it makes porting easier for anyone who wants to focus on a particular architecture. I understand that Juju upstream have no plans to support armhf for this package though for example, which will FTBFS. But I understand that FTBFS is the preferred status and helps inform everyone about the status.
I will leave this between Juju upstream and the archive admins and release teams to resolve in this bug if necessary.
Also, following a brief IRC conversation, I decided to make the package Arch: any. I understand that this is the convention since it makes porting easier for anyone who wants to focus on a particular architecture. I understand that Juju upstream have no plans to support armhf for this package though for example, which will FTBFS. But I understand that FTBFS is the preferred status and helps inform everyone about the status.
I will leave this between Juju upstream and the archive admins and release teams to resolve in this bug if necessary.