On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:26 AM, John A Meinel <email address hidden> wrote:
> offhand, I would think we'd want to use the term "arm64" for this (to
> match arm), but I don't have a strong stake in what we call it.
I'd prefer arm64 as well (easier to type, 1:1 mapping for dpkg arch).
It apparently isn't required that this match the dpkg arch - that
isn't the case for ARM32 where juju calls it "arm" but the relevant
corresponding dpkg arch is 'armhf'.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:26 AM, John A Meinel <email address hidden> wrote:
> offhand, I would think we'd want to use the term "arm64" for this (to
> match arm), but I don't have a strong stake in what we call it.
I'd prefer arm64 as well (easier to type, 1:1 mapping for dpkg arch).
It apparently isn't required that this match the dpkg arch - that
isn't the case for ARM32 where juju calls it "arm" but the relevant
corresponding dpkg arch is 'armhf'.