Thanks for the report!
For a security update, this is a pretty large diff. Looking at the buffer overflow that got fixed[1], I think the situation needed to abuse it aren't realistic.
A new jfsutils will be part of edgy+1, at which time these problems will be fixed.
[1] http://jfs.cvs.sourceforge.net/jfs/jfsutils/libfs/fssubs.c?r1=1.20&r2=1.21
Thanks for the report!
For a security update, this is a pretty large diff. Looking at the buffer overflow that got fixed[1], I think the situation needed to abuse it aren't realistic.
A new jfsutils will be part of edgy+1, at which time these problems will be fixed.
[1] http:// jfs.cvs. sourceforge. net/jfs/ jfsutils/ libfs/fssubs. c?r1=1. 20&r2=1. 21