(In reply to comment #3)
>
> not a bug.
>
> update-alternatives --display java
>
> should display the alternatives used. the free java alternatives do have a
> higher priority than the non-free ones.
is too a bug -- perhaps in the priorities.
It makes no sense for a 1.4 JDK to have a higher priority than a 1.5 one, even
if the 1.4 is free and the 1.5 isn't.
(In reply to comment #3)
>
> not a bug.
>
> update-alternatives --display java
>
> should display the alternatives used. the free java alternatives do have a
> higher priority than the non-free ones.
is too a bug -- perhaps in the priorities.
It makes no sense for a 1.4 JDK to have a higher priority than a 1.5 one, even
if the 1.4 is free and the 1.5 isn't.
At the very least, the user should be asked.