On closer inspection, 266630 is not the same bug as 265078; the former
is about a conflicts with tetex-base, the later about a conflict with a
particular version of tetex-bin.
It is the former bug that I will be NMUing to address.
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--KSyhVCl2eeZHT0Rn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 01:54:05 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: (last time, really)
--KSyhVCl2eeZHT0Rn Disposition: inline Transfer- Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
unmerge 266630
tags 265078 sarge-ignore
thanks
On closer inspection, 266630 is not the same bug as 265078; the former
is about a conflicts with tetex-base, the later about a conflict with a
particular version of tetex-bin.
It is the former bug that I will be NMUing to address.
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--KSyhVCl2eeZHT0Rn pgp-signature; name="signature .asc" Description: Digital signature Disposition: inline
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
ufymYLloRAnenAJ 4zj9IPAa32MagCI Ora/1H7p6ylUACg ojpR LWzVae1I=
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBMuspKN6
1kp9e7OiGZGhJCg
=y5X0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--KSyhVCl2eeZHT 0Rn--