Comment 4 for bug 7400

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 00:58:11 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: jadetex vs etex

--/qIPZgKzMPM+y5U5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

merge 265078 265129 265484
tags 265078 sarge-ignore
thanks

These bugs appear to be identical, and according to Andreas Metzler's
analysis, the problem only occurs with a particular unreleased version
of tetex-bin; I'm therefore merging the bugs and tagging them
sarge-ignore.

If there's any reason that the current jadetex should need to conflict
with older, *released* versions of tetex-bin, please remove the
sarge-ignore tag.

--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

--/qIPZgKzMPM+y5U5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBMt4PKN6ufymYLloRAk31AKC0e3IigUcNIKM9KBaUDR44NqCemQCffoKO
HOJkoGeLcQ+ZCpD9qvKp+rw=
=lnUF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--/qIPZgKzMPM+y5U5--