Can confirm this with DHCP instead of BOOTP as well:
Apr 19 17:51:48 curacao dhcpd[18031]: reuse_lease: lease age 671 (secs) under 25% threshold, reply with unaltered, existing lease
Apr 19 17:51:48 curacao dhcpd[18031]: DHCPDISCOVER from 08:00:27:44:28:00 via eth0
Apr 19 17:51:49 curacao dhcpd[18031]: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.0.60 to 08:00:27:04:2f:0f via eth0
Can confirm this with DHCP instead of BOOTP as well:
Apr 19 17:51:48 curacao dhcpd[18031]: reuse_lease: lease age 671 (secs) under 25% threshold, reply with unaltered, existing lease
Apr 19 17:51:48 curacao dhcpd[18031]: DHCPDISCOVER from 08:00:27:44:28:00 via eth0
Apr 19 17:51:49 curacao dhcpd[18031]: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.0.60 to 08:00:27:04:2f:0f via eth0
Has this been reported upstream?