should we mark as a duplicate of bug #340873 then? it seems to me that 340873 is a slightly different issue, and that the patch you posted there should instead be attached here... I'm no expert, though...
should we mark as a duplicate of bug #340873 then?
it seems to me that 340873 is a slightly different issue, and that the patch you posted there should instead be attached here... I'm no expert, though...