On 20.10.2017 [08:24:37 -0700], Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> On 20.10.2017 [07:18:15 -0000], Jan Gutter wrote:
> > I had a look at the two proposals and could not spot any obvious
> > mistakes:
> >
> > - the correct upstream git commit has been cherry-picked
> > - I don't have any objections to attribution or log messages
> >
> > Thanks again for shepherding this one through!
>
> You're welcome, I'll upload them both today.
>
> Thank you and Monique for filing the SRU template properly!
I have sponsored both packages. They will need to be approved by an SRU
team member (probably next week) before they appear in
{trusty,xenial}-proposed and then they will need testing as built in
proposed, with a minimum bake time of 7 days in proposed.
Thank you and Monique for your contribution to Ubuntu!
On 20.10.2017 [08:24:37 -0700], Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> On 20.10.2017 [07:18:15 -0000], Jan Gutter wrote:
> > I had a look at the two proposals and could not spot any obvious
> > mistakes:
> >
> > - the correct upstream git commit has been cherry-picked
> > - I don't have any objections to attribution or log messages
> >
> > Thanks again for shepherding this one through!
>
> You're welcome, I'll upload them both today.
>
> Thank you and Monique for filing the SRU template properly!
I have sponsored both packages. They will need to be approved by an SRU xenial} -proposed and then they will need testing as built in
team member (probably next week) before they appear in
{trusty,
proposed, with a minimum bake time of 7 days in proposed.
Thank you and Monique for your contribution to Ubuntu!
-Nish