Ubuntu
iproute package

  1. Bug #16137
  2. Comment #28

Comment 28 for bug 16137

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 21:06:56 +1100
From: Herbert Xu <email address hidden>
To: "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@" <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>,
 <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: multiple neighbour cache tables for AF_INET

On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 07:46:05AM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote:
> In article <email address hidden> (at Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:19:49 +1100), Herbert Xu <email address hidden> says:
>
> > IMHO you need to give the user a way to specify which table they want
> > to operate on. If they don't specify one, then the current behaviour
> > of choosing the first table found is reasonble.
>
> We have dev. Isn't is sufficient?

It could be used for neigh_add/neigh_delete. We'll need to add a way
to query whether a given table is the right one for a device.

For dump it isn't the same. However, perhaps it's not too important
to query a specific table.

Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <email address hidden>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt