On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:31 AM, dann frazier
<email address hidden> wrote:
> fyi, it looks like this could occur if a misbehaving bmc's status
> register contained 0xff. That's another reason to check to see if the
> older kernel works. If the previously working kernel also shows this
> problem, I'd suggest removing power from the system to see if you can
> reset the BMC.
This was working on -36 kernel and stop working right after the kernel upgrade.
I will try to schedule a downtime to reboot back to older kernel and verify
and collect the dmesg as Stefan suggested.
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:31 AM, dann frazier
<email address hidden> wrote:
> fyi, it looks like this could occur if a misbehaving bmc's status
> register contained 0xff. That's another reason to check to see if the
> older kernel works. If the previously working kernel also shows this
> problem, I'd suggest removing power from the system to see if you can
> reset the BMC.
This was working on -36 kernel and stop working right after the kernel upgrade.
I will try to schedule a downtime to reboot back to older kernel and verify
and collect the dmesg as Stefan suggested.
> /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 916200 /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ ipmitool/ +bug/916200/ +subscriptions
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> missing kernel module ipmi_si module
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?