On 6/10/20 5:48 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> This has been reported to be fixed on very similar processors (with the
> same microcode signature as yours) in the 20200609 microcode updates,
> could you test them?
>
I see four versions on your webpage:
two versions of 3.20200609.0ubuntu0.16.04.1
and two versions of 3.20200609.0ubuntu0.16.04.0.
I downloaded all four and both versions of 3.20200609.0ubuntu0.16.04.1
compared without any differences AND both versions of
3.20200609.0ubuntu0.16.04.0 compared without any differences. So in
spite of the statement on the web page that each of those versions had a
different publishing time, the two versions of .1 seem to be the same
and the two versions of .0 seem to be the same.
So I tried BOTH versions and warm reboots DID work with either .0 or .1.
I left my machine with 3.20200609.0ubuntu0.16.04.1
Let me know if I missed any version you wished me to test...
On 6/10/20 5:48 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> This has been reported to be fixed on very similar processors (with the
> same microcode signature as yours) in the 20200609 microcode updates,
> could you test them?
>
I see four versions on your webpage:
two versions of 3.20200609. 0ubuntu0. 16.04.1 0ubuntu0. 16.04.0.
and two versions of 3.20200609.
I downloaded all four and both versions of 3.20200609. 0ubuntu0. 16.04.1 0ubuntu0. 16.04.0 compared without any differences. So in
compared without any differences AND both versions of
3.20200609.
spite of the statement on the web page that each of those versions had a
different publishing time, the two versions of .1 seem to be the same
and the two versions of .0 seem to be the same.
So I tried BOTH versions and warm reboots DID work with either .0 or .1.
I left my machine with 3.20200609. 0ubuntu0. 16.04.1
Let me know if I missed any version you wished me to test...
Harry McGavran