> However, isn't this really a separate issue?
Not sure - isn't it no longer ignored now (on linux&win) with the committed changes for GCC 4.6? (AFAIU the new '-Wl,--export-dynamic' option explicitly passes it on to the GNU linker, whereas it was silently dropped prior to the changes)
> However, isn't this really a separate issue?
Not sure - isn't it no longer ignored now (on linux&win) with the committed changes for GCC 4.6? export- dynamic' option explicitly passes it on to the GNU linker, whereas it was silently dropped prior to the changes)
(AFAIU the new '-Wl,--