Ah I didn't realise the freeze for Jessie was in effect... no, I doubt that Inkscape will meet the exception policy!
I guess we should push ahead with a merge from experimental then, but it might be a bit fiddly. Would it be reasonable to do something like:
bzr branch lp:debian/inkscape debian-inkscape cd debian-inkscape
# First merge debian/experimental -> debian/unstable
bzr merge debian-experimental bzr commit
# Now merge debian/unstable -> ubuntu cd .. bzr branch lp:ubuntu/inkscape ubuntu-inkscape cd ubuntu-inkscape bzr merge debian-inkscape bzr commit
Is this a sensible approach, or will it cause headaches?
Ah I didn't realise the freeze for Jessie was in effect... no, I doubt that Inkscape will meet the exception policy!
I guess we should push ahead with a merge from experimental then, but it might be a bit fiddly. Would it be reasonable to do something like:
bzr branch lp:debian/inkscape debian-inkscape
cd debian-inkscape
# First merge debian/experimental -> debian/unstable
bzr merge debian-experimental
bzr commit
# Now merge debian/unstable -> ubuntu
cd ..
bzr branch lp:ubuntu/inkscape ubuntu-inkscape
cd ubuntu-inkscape
bzr merge debian-inkscape
bzr commit
Is this a sensible approach, or will it cause headaches?