Yeah, I should have done that. I'm really getting tired and sleepy, sorry about that.
The 28 seconds is the one we had before as well (the 27-28 s in ... v9, wasn't it ?
But this error caused the script / function to behave similarly to v4 in terms of timings. Could this indicate something else (e.g. that the original script contain some error) ?
But why this minimum of almost 30 seconds ? Is it to satisfy some RFC ?
Yeah, I should have done that. I'm really getting tired and sleepy, sorry about that.
The 28 seconds is the one we had before as well (the 27-28 s in ... v9, wasn't it ?
But this error caused the script / function to behave similarly to v4 in terms of timings. Could this indicate something else (e.g. that the original script contain some error) ?
But why this minimum of almost 30 seconds ? Is it to satisfy some RFC ?