On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 20:42 +0000, Andrew Conkling wrote:
> I get that. I asked because Andrea Corbellini had mentioned the latest
> updates while changing the importance of Hardy, so, I'm not sure, I thought
> he was talking about the latest Hardy updates. If (he could confirm and) you
> could test it on Hardy, and it works there, then maybe we could see about a
> possible backport to fix this?
I was speaking about latest Hardy updates but it seems the fix was
"unwilling" because this bug still open.
I've changed the importance because this bug is not critical at all.
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 20:42 +0000, Andrew Conkling wrote:
> I get that. I asked because Andrea Corbellini had mentioned the latest
> updates while changing the importance of Hardy, so, I'm not sure, I thought
> he was talking about the latest Hardy updates. If (he could confirm and) you
> could test it on Hardy, and it works there, then maybe we could see about a
> possible backport to fix this?
I was speaking about latest Hardy updates but it seems the fix was
"unwilling" because this bug still open.
I've changed the importance because this bug is not critical at all.