I think we intended to make "init" Essential again after the systemd switch, and this somehow slipped our minds, or we hadn't noticed any dire consequences of not doing so. I've done this now, and will monitor if fixing this bug will cause others elsewhere.
I think we intended to make "init" Essential again after the systemd switch, and this somehow slipped our minds, or we hadn't noticed any dire consequences of not doing so. I've done this now, and will monitor if fixing this bug will cause others elsewhere.