indicator-datetime-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()

Bug #1218316 reported by kylea
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
indicator-datetime (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Linux kylea-hpxt 3.11.0-4-generic #9-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 26 15:21:06 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Description: Ubuntu Saucy Salamander (development branch)
Release: 13.10

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
Package: indicator-datetime 12.10.3+13.10.20130822.1-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-4.9-generic 3.11.0-rc7
Uname: Linux 3.11.0-4-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.12.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Aug 28 20:38:59 2013
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/indicator-datetime-service
ExecutableTimestamp: 1377208642
InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-03-22 (159 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 "Raring Ringtail" - Alpha amd64 (20130319)
MarkForUpload: True
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/indicator-datetime-service
ProcCwd: /home/kylea
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7f3618bc6f90 <_IO_vfprintf_internal+14352>: repnz scas %es:(%rdi),%al
 PC (0x7f3618bc6f90) ok
 source "%es:(%rdi)" (0x00000001) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%al" ok
SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: indicator-datetime
StacktraceTop:
 g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_signal_emit () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdbus-glib-1.so.2
Title: indicator-datetime-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-08-28 (0 days ago)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev root sambashare sudo vboxusers

Revision history for this message
kylea (kylea) wrote :
information type: Private → Public
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1195874, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.