On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 07:53 +0000, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Reopening, the addition of the dependency is more a mitigating
> workaround than a proper fix. It's not really true, either - as soon as
> someone writes a second indicator module, there's a legitimate use-case
> for wanting indicator-applet installed without indicator-messages.
Well, I can kinda see that. But effectively this bug number is tracking
two bugs. Martin fixed the first one. I've fixed the second but it
hasn't been uploaded yet.
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 07:53 +0000, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Reopening, the addition of the dependency is more a mitigating
> workaround than a proper fix. It's not really true, either - as soon as
> someone writes a second indicator module, there's a legitimate use-case
> for wanting indicator-applet installed without indicator-messages.
Well, I can kinda see that. But effectively this bug number is tracking
two bugs. Martin fixed the first one. I've fixed the second but it
hasn't been uploaded yet.