Comment 16 for bug 23786

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 03:20:34 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <email address hidden>
To: Josselin Mouette <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Cc: Ron <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#333479: gdk-imlib1: gdk-imblib1 should not explicitly conflict with libpng2

--JI+G0+mN8WmwPnOn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 11:48:38AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 12 octobre 2005 =E0 18:37 +0930, Ron a =E9crit :
> > > You should just rebuild the package against gdk-imlib11, that's all.
> > > That package is linked against libpng12, as libpng2/libpng10 has been
> > > removed as well.

> > In this case I just need to fix the build-dep from png10 -> png12,
> > (for the bits I'm responsible for) but I guess I missed the memo
> > that we were rolling on that this week. I'm not unhappy that it's
> > happening, just surprised at how...

> D'uh, I'm really sorry, I must have missed libwxgtk2.4 when filing bug
> reports asking for the rebuild. Sorry about that.

There's actually no good reason for wxgtk2.4 to build-depend on libpng2-dev,
AFAICT, because *none* of the binary packages it builds depend on
libpng10-0. So I wonder why this build dependency is there...

--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
<email address hidden> http://www.debian.org/

--JI+G0+mN8WmwPnOn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDTONyKN6ufymYLloRAtClAJ95V7KneHuwbID/uoX/4aSVbUhfnACeKXdl
+hXrppP6QkLunoT2RazFJlI=
=lPAm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--JI+G0+mN8WmwPnOn--