correction - the mismatch between the underlying network device and the vlan interface causes the error:
Apr 04 14:15:23 reflecting-attraction ifup[5936]: run-parts: executing /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/vlan
Apr 04 14:15:23 reflecting-attraction ifup[5936]: Set name-type for VLAN subsystem. Should be visible in /proc/net/vlan/config
Apr 04 14:15:23 reflecting-attraction ifup[5936]: Added VLAN with VID == 2667 to IF -:eth1:-
Apr 04 14:15:23 reflecting-attraction ifup[5936]: /bin/ip addr add 10.245.184.20/255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.245.184.255 dev eth1.2667 label eth1.2667
Apr 04 14:15:23 reflecting-attraction ifup[5936]: /bin/ip link set dev eth1.2667 mtu 9000 up
Apr 04 14:15:23 reflecting-attraction ifup[5936]: RTNETLINK answers: Numerical result out of range
We can probably work around this by ensuring that the mtu is set correctly on the base interface as well.
correction - the mismatch between the underlying network device and the vlan interface causes the error:
Apr 04 14:15:23 reflecting- attraction ifup[5936]: run-parts: executing /etc/network/ if-pre- up.d/vlan attraction ifup[5936]: Set name-type for VLAN subsystem. Should be visible in /proc/net/ vlan/config attraction ifup[5936]: Added VLAN with VID == 2667 to IF -:eth1:- attraction ifup[5936]: /bin/ip addr add 10.245. 184.20/ 255.255. 255.0 broadcast 10.245.184.255 dev eth1.2667 label eth1.2667 attraction ifup[5936]: /bin/ip link set dev eth1.2667 mtu 9000 up attraction ifup[5936]: RTNETLINK answers: Numerical result out of range
Apr 04 14:15:23 reflecting-
Apr 04 14:15:23 reflecting-
Apr 04 14:15:23 reflecting-
Apr 04 14:15:23 reflecting-
Apr 04 14:15:23 reflecting-
We can probably work around this by ensuring that the mtu is set correctly on the base interface as well.