> The fix i intended was to dhclient, so that dhclient would wait in PREINIT6 dhclient-script.
Looks good to me, fixing dhclient as well is a good idea.
> I think that is generally more functional as it would mean ifupdown or any other user of dhclient > would get the fix.
What other users are there of dhclient, besides ifupdown (and manually running dhclient)?
> The fix i intended was to dhclient, so that dhclient would wait in PREINIT6 dhclient-script.
Looks good to me, fixing dhclient as well is a good idea.
> I think that is generally more functional as it would mean ifupdown or any other user of dhclient
> would get the fix.
What other users are there of dhclient, besides ifupdown (and manually running dhclient)?