On 2012-10-30 22:24, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> You really think that delay 10 seconds is enough?
No, I know it's not. But, as you know, the more robust fix of this issue will happen when the deprecated im-switch is exchanged for im-config. And that's going to happen soon irrespective of this bug.
I didn't mean to imply anything else with cleaning up some tasks.
On 2012-10-30 22:24, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> You really think that delay 10 seconds is enough?
No, I know it's not. But, as you know, the more robust fix of this issue will happen when the deprecated im-switch is exchanged for im-config. And that's going to happen soon irrespective of this bug.
I didn't mean to imply anything else with cleaning up some tasks.