On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 12:01:40PM IST, Oli wrote:
> It *was* my belief that the lib32 libs are just repackaged builds of the
> 32bit libs. It sounds like that is not the case but considering it works,
> why not do just that?
The plan is to get rid of this big piece of monolithic baggage that is ia32-libs. It will take a while, but if moving pulse to having lib32 packages helps with that process, then its well worth it.
Long term, there are much better plans for multi-architecture support, but these are probably a release or two away at least.
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 12:01:40PM IST, Oli wrote:
> It *was* my belief that the lib32 libs are just repackaged builds of the
> 32bit libs. It sounds like that is not the case but considering it works,
> why not do just that?
The plan is to get rid of this big piece of monolithic baggage that is ia32-libs. It will take a while, but if moving pulse to having lib32 packages helps with that process, then its well worth it.
Long term, there are much better plans for multi-architecture support, but these are probably a release or two away at least.
Luke