The only problem I see with that approach is that it doesn't tell us *which* icons are available. We should define the nsILookAndFeel value to mean "GTK 2.6 stock icons are available" or something.
This is incredibly lame, GTK+ should provide at least a fallback icon instead of having these APIs just fail when GNOME libraries are missing.
The only problem I see with that approach is that it doesn't tell us *which* icons are available. We should define the nsILookAndFeel value to mean "GTK 2.6 stock icons are available" or something.
This is incredibly lame, GTK+ should provide at least a fallback icon instead of having these APIs just fail when GNOME libraries are missing.