(In reply to comment #5)
> The OP mentioned two problems, that patch seems to fix the first one, but does
> it really solve the second problem:
>
> >It also seems that using the new kernel API, the state of the battery is not
> >updated properly.
>
if lshal | grep -i bat should display current battery values, it is wrong.
lshal | grep -i bat shows different values from sysfs interface.
I noticed that these values get reloaded at an acpi event (reloaded by hal, directory content is updated on the fly).
(In reply to comment #5)
> The OP mentioned two problems, that patch seems to fix the first one, but does
> it really solve the second problem:
>
> >It also seems that using the new kernel API, the state of the battery is not
> >updated properly.
>
if lshal | grep -i bat should display current battery values, it is wrong.
lshal | grep -i bat shows different values from sysfs interface.
I noticed that these values get reloaded at an acpi event (reloaded by hal, directory content is updated on the fly).