OK, I researched the history of this a bit. It seems that this chip is used in two different devices, but with the same product ID, and speak two different protocols:
The 1 here was assumedly correct when this got committed first. But it is not called "ONDA" here. So perhaps we need a more fine-grained differentiation based on product names. Can anyone who is affected by this please do
OK, I researched the history of this a bit. It seems that this chip is used in two different devices, but with the same product ID, and speak two different protocols:
<!-- Qualcomm: Telstra/NextG CDMA , ZTE CDMA Tech --> :usb.product_ id" int_outof= "0x0001; 0xfffe" > :usb.interface. number" int="0"> command_ sets" type="strlist" >IS-707- A</append>
<match <email address hidden>
<match <email address hidden>
<append key="modem.
</match>
</match>
The 1 here was assumedly correct when this got committed first. But it is not called "ONDA" here. So perhaps we need a more fine-grained differentiation based on product names. Can anyone who is affected by this please do
lshal > /tmp/hal.txt
and attach /tmp/hal.txt here?