Comment 50 for bug 199215

I suddenly have doubts about your choice of words -

>>> there is thousand of bugs fixed every cycles and the team doesn't have the resources to backport all that to stable, also copying all the unstable code change to stable would mean it would become unstable..
<<<

Why is a bug-fix being confused with feature backports? The new features would be the unstable bit that don't need to get back into the stable release. I do appreciate the argument about the resource crunch, but I do feel the Ubuntu team is skipping on its commitment to fix bugs in LTS releases.

Please clarify.

Regards