[MIR] gupnp-av

[Sebastien Bacher]

* Availability

Builds on all supported architectures in Ubuntu and on sync from Debian

* Rationale

We would like to enable dlna sharing of media files, which is a GNOME upstream feature and relying on rygel which depends on the gupnp libraries, including the gupnp-dlna one

* Security

No CVE/known security issue

* Quality assurance

- the desktop-packages team is subscribed to the package
- the bug lists in upstream, the Debian PTS and launchpad are empty
- upstream has a testsuit which is not being used during build, we are going to look at changing that

* Dependendies

The package uses standard desktop libraries that are already in main (gstreamer, glib)

* Standards compliance

the package is using standard packaging (dh10), the standards-version is 3.9.8, the package is in sync from Debian

* Maintainance

Upstream is active and the desktop team is going to look after the package in ubuntu

[Launchpad Janitor (janitor)]

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

[Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks)]

* -doc package: I think we should promote it as well in main, if the -dev is promoted. If so, this dep should be fixed: Depends: lynx | www-browser (first is lynx, in universe, www-browser is a virtual package not fullfiled?). In addition, it ships the doc in devhelp format (despite symlink from doc/ to gtk-doc/).
I don't think anyway that those are needed, we don't tend to have -doc dep on a browser implementation.
* Same remark than for the other MIR: let's look at enabling the testsuite during build + autopkgtests
* Same kind of lintian warnings than for gupnp-dlna worths fixing or override + comments IMHO (gir-missing-typelib-dependency and typelib-package-name-does-not-match)

Minor:
- VCS could be updated in debian/control*

Pasting from gupnp-dlna:
I think some of the stuff should be addressed like test running before I give my +1. This part doesn't deal directly with the network, but as we are looking at the whole dlna stack, I will defer to the security team for a review from a security perspective. I didn't spot anything crazy in the code itself, but I prefer deferring to experts

[Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks)]

Tests are actually ran during package build. So, good in that regard. Should it ran as autopkgtests though?

[Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks)]

Let's turn those as incomplete to get off the list until we get over them again (probably next cycle).

[Launchpad Janitor (janitor)]

[Expired for gupnp-av (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.]

[Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks)]

+1 on the MIR side