Comment 40 for bug 22930

sure, there is a balance.

and there are more important bugs to fix. thats why this one has been open
for 5+ years. still, i believe that maybe theres a better way to do it?
this bug can easily be fixed in 15 minutes by the person who wrote this code
in the first place. is that who would normally fix it? can't we just track
him down or something?

maybe thats a way to move the bugs along a bit better, to have people fix
their own code? that way, maybe we won't just be skimming off the top of
the priority list all the time?

On 10/9/07, ChrisC <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> I noticed this bug over five years ago in Winbloze !!!
>
> reporting this upstream will have little result "theres a workround"
>
> I think submitting a patch upstream that hides then shows a button when
> it becomes enabled, might embarrass the people upstream to actually fix
> the problem. especially if it comes from an "official" Ubuntu source
> (at the very least we'll have a package manager (and other apps) that
> work properly!)
>
> and btw if new features are more important than bug fixing then that
> makes bug #1 look like spin (sadly)
>
> There's a distro called Vista that has tonnes of new bu... errm
> features
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try
> it
> now.
> http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/
>
> --
> Newly-sensitive button ignores clicks until cursor re-enters it
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22930
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of a duplicate bug.
>