On 2017-05-20 01:20 PM, hackeron wrote:
> Wow, how can a package that does not install because of a syntax error
> be committed to production? - Are there no automated tests to prevent
> this sort of thing?
This package is in -proposed specifically to catch such mistakes before
they hit -update. Don't run your prod with -proposed enabled.
On 2017-05-20 01:20 PM, hackeron wrote:
> Wow, how can a package that does not install because of a syntax error
> be committed to production? - Are there no automated tests to prevent
> this sort of thing?
This package is in -proposed specifically to catch such mistakes before
they hit -update. Don't run your prod with -proposed enabled.