Comment 6 for bug 1675522

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:01 AM, ChristianEhrhardt
<email address hidden> wrote:
> Hi Dann, thanks for your checks already!
> Are you intending to break this down if e.g. Yakkety qemu is fixed as well as zesty seems?
> And then once we know if Y is good maybe even down to a bisect of qemu in that regard?

hey Christian! Yep, that's my plan.

> Given your checks already the test seems to be as "easy" as "boot zesty
> + reboot = crash".
>
> Do you happen to know:
> - if it makes a difference what exact arm HW (more diverse than x86 at least) the host has?
> - if it could be reproduced on qemu on x86 doing arm emulation?

I don't have these data points yet, but I can collect them if the
bisection method doesn't turn up a quick answer.

  -dann