Comment 11 for bug 109204

That's good news about this bug being fixed in the next release, but can't Sam's fix be incorporated into the current libgoffice-0-3 for those of us who don't want to update goffice and gnumeric to a version that may be less stable in feisty? Update Manager keeps nagging me to update libgoffice, and I don't know if it wants to replace my patched libgoffice from Sam with the broken one in the repos. Last time I agreed to let libgoffice update, the repo version had the bug and I had to re-install Sam's version.