On Dec 07, Mike Mestnik <email address hidden> wrote:
> This should fix about 3 or 4 BUGS in devfs.rules and support scripts.=20
I already explained that there is no bug in devfs.rules. If you don't
like the default configuration then change it on your system.
And get a clue, this is not a grave bug.
--=20
ciao, |
Marco | [9637 prI36eOja2Iuw]
--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 18:13:08 +0100
From: <email address hidden> (Marco d'Itri)
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#284492: devfs.rules: Don't change NAME into a port(host?/bus?) specific target,
for gvm.)
--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Disposition: inline Transfer- Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
On Dec 07, Mike Mestnik <email address hidden> wrote:
> This should fix about 3 or 4 BUGS in devfs.rules and support scripts.=20
I already explained that there is no bug in devfs.rules. If you don't
like the default configuration then change it on your system.
And get a clue, this is not a grave bug.
--=20
ciao, |
Marco | [9637 prI36eOja2Iuw]
--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G pgp-signature; name="signature .asc" Description: Digital signature Disposition: inline
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
w2OHuP7ERAs7uAJ wNQ5gDN8ymf9QYc Cd3eY92c55xIgCg iifS fr++Wo0I=
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBteSkFGf
ot/PfwjuiK1nwTr
=m9Xa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--k1lZvvs/ B4yU6o8G- -