On 20 September 2012 18:29, Sworddragon <email address hidden> wrote:
> Are you sure that this is the correct behavior?
Yes.
> Some time before I have
> opened this ticket it worked like expected: If I have started an
> application in the background I could close the terminal without closing
> the application.
Some programs take special measures for this; most do not. You should
not expect any process started from a specific shell to survive after
you exit that shell. If you want to start an arbitrary program, use
the run dialog (ALT-F2) – this is what it's for.
> The only explanation would be that another process
> become the new parent (maybe init).
Not init (exit from the desktop session and see that the program in
question is closed).
On 20 September 2012 18:29, Sworddragon <email address hidden> wrote:
> Are you sure that this is the correct behavior?
Yes.
> Some time before I have
> opened this ticket it worked like expected: If I have started an
> application in the background I could close the terminal without closing
> the application.
Some programs take special measures for this; most do not. You should
not expect any process started from a specific shell to survive after
you exit that shell. If you want to start an arbitrary program, use
the run dialog (ALT-F2) – this is what it's for.
> The only explanation would be that another process
> become the new parent (maybe init).
Not init (exit from the desktop session and see that the program in
question is closed).