I think that the "pac+" scheme is added by libproxy0:
From libproxy/src/plugins/gnome.c:
// Mode is wpad:// or pac+http://...
else if (!strcmp(mode, "auto"))
{
char *tmp = gconf_client_get_string(client, "/system/proxy/autoconfig_url", NULL);
if (px_url_is_valid(tmp))
url = g_strdup_printf("pac+%s", tmp);
else
url = px_strdup("wpad://");
px_free(tmp);
}
I don't know if it is libproxy0 that exports that value to the environment without removing the pac scheme though, or some gnome component.
I also don't know if keeping the "pac+" scheme is the right thing to do or not... But it might be a good idea to notify the libproxy0 developers to see this bug report.
I think that the "pac+" scheme is added by libproxy0:
From libproxy/ src/plugins/ gnome.c: get_string( client, "/system/ proxy/autoconfi g_url", NULL); is_valid( tmp)) printf( "pac+%s" , tmp); "wpad:/ /");
// Mode is wpad:// or pac+http://...
else if (!strcmp(mode, "auto"))
{
char *tmp = gconf_client_
if (px_url_
url = g_strdup_
else
url = px_strdup(
px_free(tmp);
}
I don't know if it is libproxy0 that exports that value to the environment without removing the pac scheme though, or some gnome component.
I also don't know if keeping the "pac+" scheme is the right thing to do or not... But it might be a good idea to notify the libproxy0 developers to see this bug report.