> Double clicking, by design, is _not_ meant to select URLs.
Really? Which design is that?
And regardless of whether or not double click is meant to select URLs,
it's a literal fact that it did in fact (largely) select URLs for many
years.
> So, guys, there's nothing to see here. Please move on.
You're obviously welcome to your opinion, but it's a little strange to
end 77 lines and 705 words with the claim that there is "nothing to
see here" and a request to "move on".
> This bug should be closed as invalid.
That's your opinion; in my opinion this is a regression in Ubuntu.
Egmont Koblinger <email address hidden> writes:
> Double clicking, by design, is _not_ meant to select URLs.
Really? Which design is that?
And regardless of whether or not double click is meant to select URLs,
it's a literal fact that it did in fact (largely) select URLs for many
years.
> So, guys, there's nothing to see here. Please move on.
You're obviously welcome to your opinion, but it's a little strange to
end 77 lines and 705 words with the claim that there is "nothing to
see here" and a request to "move on".
> This bug should be closed as invalid.
That's your opinion; in my opinion this is a regression in Ubuntu.
--
James