| 2006-12-15 05:48:34 |
Andrew Conkling |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2006-12-21 23:41:25 |
Sebastien Bacher |
gnome-system-tools: status |
Unconfirmed |
Needs Info |
|
| 2006-12-21 23:41:25 |
Sebastien Bacher |
gnome-system-tools: importance |
Undecided |
Low |
|
| 2006-12-21 23:41:25 |
Sebastien Bacher |
gnome-system-tools: statusexplanation |
|
Thank you for your bug. Does installing "ntp-server" from synaptic works fine? |
|
| 2006-12-21 23:41:25 |
Sebastien Bacher |
gnome-system-tools: assignee |
|
desktop-bugs |
|
| 2006-12-22 06:07:14 |
Andrew Conkling |
gnome-system-tools: status |
Needs Info |
Unconfirmed |
|
| 2006-12-22 06:07:14 |
Andrew Conkling |
gnome-system-tools: statusexplanation |
Thank you for your bug. Does installing "ntp-server" from synaptic works fine? |
On 12/21/06, Sebastien Bacher <seb128@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Thank you for your bug. Does installing "ntp-server" from synaptic works
> fine?
I can't install ntp-server:
"Depends: ntp-simple but it is not going to be installed or
ntp-refclock but it is not going to be installed
Depends: ntp but it is not going to be installed"
Each of those depends on ntp. I suspect some dependencies haven't been synced, because each is a transition package and both have been replaced with ntp.
Seems like maybe this bug affects ntp packages instead? |
|
| 2006-12-22 08:55:30 |
Sebastien Bacher |
gnome-system-tools: status |
Unconfirmed |
Confirmed |
|
| 2006-12-22 08:55:30 |
Sebastien Bacher |
gnome-system-tools: importance |
Low |
High |
|
| 2006-12-22 08:55:30 |
Sebastien Bacher |
gnome-system-tools: statusexplanation |
On 12/21/06, Sebastien Bacher <seb128@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Thank you for your bug. Does installing "ntp-server" from synaptic works
> fine?
I can't install ntp-server:
"Depends: ntp-simple but it is not going to be installed or
ntp-refclock but it is not going to be installed
Depends: ntp but it is not going to be installed"
Each of those depends on ntp. I suspect some dependencies haven't been synced, because each is a transition package and both have been replaced with ntp.
Seems like maybe this bug affects ntp packages instead? |
ntp bug then, reassigning |
|
| 2006-12-22 08:55:30 |
Sebastien Bacher |
gnome-system-tools: assignee |
desktop-bugs |
|
|
| 2007-01-09 15:31:52 |
Sebastien Bacher |
ntp: status |
Confirmed |
Fix Released |
|
| 2007-01-09 15:31:52 |
Sebastien Bacher |
ntp: assignee |
|
desktop-bugs |
|
| 2007-01-09 15:31:52 |
Sebastien Bacher |
ntp: statusexplanation |
ntp bug then, reassigning |
That was a gnome-system-tools bug, fixed with that upload:
Changes:
gnome-system-tools (2.17.5-0ubuntu1) feisty; urgency=low
.
* New upstream version:
Network:
- Update minimum liboobs to 2.17.5
- add support for extensible list of configuration methods and key types
* New upstream version:
Network:
- Added NM integration bits
- work nicely with older libiw
Time:
- Redesign GUI
* debian/control.in:
- updated liboobs requirement according to configure
* debian/patches/04_activate_avahi_option.dpatch:
- updated
* debian/patches/05_no_ntp.dpatch:
- dropped, ubiquity stopped using time-admin, the patch is not required
* debian/patches/21_network_support_ipv4ll.dpatch:
- dropped, the new upstream version has that feature
* debian/patches/21_new_ntp_server_name.dpatch:
- list "ntp" server (Ubuntu: #75849)
* debian/patches/82_gst-packages-time-admin.dpatch:
- make time-admin install the "ntp" package rather than "ntp-server"
* debian/patches/83_network-locations-apply-button.dpatch:
- updated
* debian/patches/98_automake.dpatch:
- updated |
|
