If you don't agree, what would you prefer? I have already mentioned two suggestions to address the inconsistency.
On 2022-05-17 05:03, Daniel van Vugt wrote:
> * Regular users are less likely to understand "pinned" as much as
> "favourites".
This is not about "Pinned" vs. "Favorites". It's about "Pin/Pinned" vs. "Add/Added" and "Dash" vs. "Dock".
My (latest) idea is to accept "Pin to Dock" as a minimum change given the current code. Another possible solution would be to keep the 22.04 solution, i.e. use the original Ubuntu terms all over also going forward.
> * Power users may have no dock, only a dash, and so the existing
> wording is correct.
Yes, for those who choose a GNOME session. My concern is the Ubuntu sessions.
* It's a patch we would have to maintain.
Something should be done. Getting rid of the the inconsistent terminology, in one way or another, is not a wishlist request. The inconsistency is a bug, which gets extra obvious when you deal with docs and translations.
@Daniel:
If you don't agree, what would you prefer? I have already mentioned two suggestions to address the inconsistency.
On 2022-05-17 05:03, Daniel van Vugt wrote:
> * Regular users are less likely to understand "pinned" as much as
> "favourites".
This is not about "Pinned" vs. "Favorites". It's about "Pin/Pinned" vs. "Add/Added" and "Dash" vs. "Dock".
My (latest) idea is to accept "Pin to Dock" as a minimum change given the current code. Another possible solution would be to keep the 22.04 solution, i.e. use the original Ubuntu terms all over also going forward.
> * Power users may have no dock, only a dash, and so the existing
> wording is correct.
Yes, for those who choose a GNOME session. My concern is the Ubuntu sessions.
* It's a patch we would have to maintain.
Something should be done. Getting rid of the the inconsistent terminology, in one way or another, is not a wishlist request. The inconsistency is a bug, which gets extra obvious when you deal with docs and translations.