I uploaded this to jammy unapproved for you and am unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors.
The tarball name isn't really an issue. If we used debian/source/format 3.0 (quilt), I think the tarball would look more like what you'd expect. But it's too late to change that for jammy.
I uploaded this to jammy unapproved for you and am unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors.
The tarball name isn't really an issue. If we used debian/ source/ format 3.0 (quilt), I think the tarball would look more like what you'd expect. But it's too late to change that for jammy.